Skip to main content

OCR homepage

  • OCR sites
  • About
  • Contact us

Administration

  • Active Results
  • Interchange
  • Log in to the OCR Repository

Support

  • ExamBuilder

Qualification sites

  • GCSE English Literature Digital Anthology

Main navigation

  • Subjects
    • Mathematics
    • English
    • Geography
    • History
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Computer science and ICT
    • Business
    • PE and sport
    See all subjects
  • Qualifications
    • AS and A Level
    • GCSE
    • Entry Level
    • Cambridge Technicals
    • Cambridge Nationals
    • Core Maths
    See all qualifications
  • Administration
    • Overviews
    • Preparation
    • Entries
    • Assessment
    • Results
    • Post-results services
    • Certificates
    • Support and tools
    Administration
    • Interchange
    • Basedata
    • Grade boundaries
    • Key dates and timetables
  • More
  • Students
    • Past papers
    • Replacement certificates
    • Exam dates and timetables
    • Getting your results
    • Convert raw marks to UMS
    • Private candidates
    More for students
  • Students
    • Past papers
    • Replacement certificates
    • Exam dates and timetables
    • Getting your results
    • Convert raw marks to UMS
    • Private candidates
    More for students
  • OCR Sites
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Home
  • Administration
  • CPC
  • Assessment
  • Malpractice
  • Whistleblowing

Whistleblowing

Malpractice: CPC

Quick Links

  • Whistleblowing

Whistleblowing

CPC

Reporting concerns

Sometimes, a member of teaching staff or member of the public has reason to believe that malpractice has or will occur in an examination or assessment. Concerns should normally be raised initially with the examination centre’s senior management. However, if this doesn’t resolve the matter, or they are believed to be involved, it should be reported to the awarding body.

Anonymity

Members of staff who wish to report suspected malpractice at a centre where they work are protected by the Public Interest Disclosure Act (PIDA). More guidance on this is available from the JCQ website. Members of the public are not protected by PIDA, but we will make every effort to protect their identity if that is what they wish, unless we are legally obliged to release it.

What information do we need?

OCR takes all reports of malpractice seriously; however, in order to investigate concerns effectively, we will require information of a reasonably detailed standard. We will accept anonymous reports, although knowing how the information has been obtained and the reporting party’s relationship with the centre may add credibility.

Anyone wishing to report suspected malpractice to OCR should include as much of the following information as possible/is relevant:

  • The qualifications and subjects involved
  • The centre involved
  • The names of staff/candidates involved
  • The regulations breached/specific nature of suspected malpractice
  • When and where the suspected malpractice occurred
  • Whether multiple examination series are affected
  • If the issue has been reported to the centre and what the outcome was
  • How the issue became apparent.

Documentary evidence can be particularly useful and should be provided where it is available. Reports of suspected malpractice should be sent to malpractice@ocr.org.uk. Our malpractice team is also happy to provide advice.

OCR is unable to share the details or outcome of any investigation conducted as such matters are confidential between OCR and the centre concerned.

Top of page
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

© OCR

  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility
  • Statement on modern slavery
  • Use of cookies
  • Copyright statement

© OCR

We use cookies. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies Accept